My Shot at the Olympics 541.2
I have the heart and spirit of a great athlete. Sadly, I never had the skills. My peak sports achievement was lettering in high school basketball, but even that small achievement is less impressive than it seems. You see, I played on the "C" team reserved for those not good enough for the "B" team, junior varsity, or varsity.
Despite my unfulfilled athletic ambitions, I love sports, especially the Olympics. So when I was asked to carry the Olympic torch during a leg of the relay preceding the 2004 games in Athens, you’d think I’d won the Nobel Prize. I relished this honor and ignored comments suggesting I was selected as a representative of the "spectacularly unfit."
But my torch run was topped when I was asked to participate in a series of intensive training sessions for all the athletes who have a serious chance of being chosen to represent the U.S. in the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing. What was really cool was I got to share this assignment with a handful of exceptionally successful, smart, and articulate Olympians from prior Games.
When I first entered the room filled with diverse but mostly young men and women, I was surprised that only a few looked like elite athletes. The rest were unremarkable in appearance, masking the one thing they had in common: They are among the best on the planet at what they do. Whether we’re talking about soccer or speed walking, that level of achievement is daunting.
As I met them, it was clear they had been invited to that room not simply because of genetic talent, but because of dedication and discipline. As in every other endeavor, competence gets you in the game, but character is the decisive difference.
This is Michael Josephson reminding you that character counts.

Comments
Mr Josephson,
I wonder if on many issues of morality, what is divided is reason. Opinions should be in agreement with truth, not with statistics.
Truth doesn’t depend on statistics or social agreement. It’s real that truth may provoke social agreement; but social agreement does not make the truth. If 99% of the world would say “the sun is a bulb” all of them would be wrong, and the other 1% would be right only if they say “the sun is a star”, that is, if they accept to be into that real truth. But beyond that 100%, the sun stays there as a star, no matter human thoughts.
Now, if I defend the sun as a star, nobody could denounce me as “fanatic of Geography” or “an intolerant owner of truth”, because Truth is a gift that must be transmitted as clear and pure as it was received. That is the mission of teachers and professionals or anyone who speaks.
The real chasm is made by pride, self-interest, passion or ignorance. I can be hurt in my feelings only if I feel out of truth, whether sincerely or not. Feelings and truth should not be mixed.
If we try to be into the truth (right thoughts and right feelings) there will be no problem on agreement.
Thank you for your great work.
Fabio G.
Posted by: Fabio Gonzalez | November 24, 2007 11:59 AM